One-Stop Solution for Advanced
Intermediates and APIs

The Consortium aims to increase the scale of cell therapy manufacturing to a level impossible with current manual processes. 

Thermo Fisher Scientific and Charles River Laboratories have joined a consortium aiming to develop a robotic manufacturing system capable of creating gene modified cell therapies on an industrial scale. Both companies say the initiative will result in ‘industry-defining technology’ that will lower manufacturing costs, reduce bottlenecks and increase patient access to cell and gene therapies.  

The Consortium was established by Multiply Labs, a US-based robotics developer, in 2021 and the team is rounded out by UCSF and Cytiva. Robotics development activities are coordinated by Multiply Labs, while the cell manufacturing process is overseen by UCSF through a sponsored research agreement. 

Speaking about the news, Multiply Labs CEO Fred Parietti said: ‘We are very excited to combine Multiply Labs’ cutting-edge expertise in cloud-controlled robotics with the GMP-ready, market-leading instrumentation technologies by Cytiva, Thermo Fisher and Charles River’.  

Thermo Fisher will collaborate with Multiply Labs on automating the operation of incubators that are utilized in the expansion of cells to therapeutically relevant levels, while Charles River will integrate its microbial testing equipment into the Multiply Labs Cluster to enable in-process product release testing. Cytiva, an early member, focuses on the automation of the Xuri bioreactor.  

Image: The Multiply Labs Cluster, a configuration of 2x5 cube modules on each side that stands nine feet tall. 

therapeutics, the complexity of manufacturing them presents a major hurdle to patient access.  

‘To fully realise the promise of cell and gene therapies, therapeutic developers need access to closed, automated manufacturing platforms which efficiently scale manufacturing for large patient populations,’ he said.  

Betty Woo, Vice President and General Manager of Cell and Gene Therapy at Thermo Fisher Scientific, echoed these sentiments.  

She said: ‘Automating the manufacturing process removes limiting factors such as the manual processing of cells, which may be susceptible to human error, while increasing the robustness and reproducibility of the manufacturing process. In short, automation is necessary for industrializing cell therapy manufacturing.'  

Woo added that the automated process maintains aseptic conditions, which is critical for patient safety, and increases product quality through process reproducibility, robustness, and consistency.  

‘By increasing the reproducibility of this process, we can better plan production to meet the demand for these life-saving therapies,’ she said.  

According to a recent Catalent report, bottlenecks are the most common hurdles faced by cell and gene therapy developers. Geopolitical concerns and issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic have exacerbated pre-existing difficulties in this area.  

As therapies for indications with large patient populations (such as solid tumors) develop, the ability to scale manufacturing efficiently will become even more important.  

The Consortium plans to present this technology at UCSF by the end of this year.